Home / Thermal Paste / Noctua NT-H1 vs Arctic MX-7

Noctua NT-H1 vs Arctic MX-7

Name: Arctic MX-7
Brand: Arctic

Compare features and trade-offs. Catalog scores are editorial assessments, not customer review averages or proof of hands-on testing.

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Catalog price ranges are estimates; check the exact model, seller, and current retailer price.

Noctua NT-H1Check price on Amazon Arctic MX-7Check price on Amazon

Higher catalog score: Noctua NT-H1 (Trust Score 9.4 vs 9.0)

🧴NN

Noctua NT-H1

Noctua

$8.00 – $12.00

9.4

Excellent

Best Overall

Pros

+Non-conductive and safe
+Very easy to apply
+Long-term stable performance

Cons

−Not the absolute best performer
−Small 3.5g tube

Don't buy if

⚠ While performance is excellent, hardcore overclockers seeking every last degree should consider liquid metal alternatives.

Check Price on Amazon

🧴AM

Arctic MX-7

Arctic

$7.00 – $11.00

9.0

Excellent

Best Value

Pros

+Improved performance over MX-6
+Metal-free, non-conductive formula
+Affordable per-gram price

Cons

−Not as fast as liquid metal
−Newer product with shorter track record

Don't buy if

⚠ The thicker consistency makes application slightly harder than NT-H1; spread evenly or use the X-pattern method.

Check Price on Amazon

Score Comparison

Metric	Noctua NT-H1	Arctic MX-7
Trust Score	9.4 ✓	9.0
Expert Score	9.2 ✓	9.0
User Sentiment	9.5 ✓	9.2
Value Score	8.1	8.9 ✓
Complaint Risk	9.5	8.7 ✓
Price	$8.00 – $12.00	$7.00 – $11.00

The Verdict

Noctua NT-H1 has a higher catalog Trust Score of 9.4 vs 9.0. It's rated "Best Overall" and has the higher overall editorial score. This does not mean it wins every individual criterion. However, the Arctic MX-7 may be a better fit depending on your specific priorities — check the pros and cons above.

View all Thermal Paste ranked →

More Thermal Paste Comparisons

Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut vs Noctua NT-H2